SG: East West Line [WB: PSR to JKN]

last SG · 2010-03-14T18:22:50+00:00

????<Probably this guy is talking about his proposed idea to merge with 2 sectors of EWL so as to speed up the entire route development, which can be diff...

kenneth1228 SG

??? What curve? It is just an imaginary file name. Anyways, I don't know what the Tsuen Wan TBS is

Tsuen Wan= A Fictional Line in Hong Kong, uses Trains such as M-Train

TBS= Turn Back Siding means the train will turn around by accelerating by the main driver and reversing the train by the other end of the train cabin driver.

FSJZ SG

Ohhh. No, I don't mean that. I am just talking about an imaginary rail that turns right with a 1000 metres radius :P

Samuel Lee SG

It is "getting off topic", I thought there is a Tsuen Wan Line in Hong Kong? (Red colour somemore)

BTW, what EWL seriously need is a rail with curves in shape and not to be forced curve when use a .curve command, since it is a straight rail afterall and hence not smooth rail.

SBS9231S SG

eh samuel i doing some touch ups on my BGS RFP le. I dune how to do Upper Tracks =X

joeyfjj SG

But I need the support from jerry (NSL) and willis (CGL)

Try putting railobjects into another folder? Like openBVE\Railway\Objects\BVESG_common\railtype?

FSJZ SG

It is "getting off topic", I thought there is a Tsuen Wan Line in Hong Kong? (Red colour somemore)

BTW, what EWL seriously need is a rail with curves in shape and not to be forced curve when use a .curve command, since it is a straight rail afterall and hence not smooth rail.

So, you have to change railtypes everytime you go into a curve? You mean curved rails with different radiuses? If you are talking about that, you can refer to Dennis Lance's tutorial. He has curved rails of different radiuses. All you need to do is just change the rock.bmp and the rail's dimension. Link: http://www.freewebs.com/dennislance/

Bryanwee1 SG

It is "getting off topic", I thought there is a Tsuen Wan Line in Hong Kong? (Red colour somemore)

BTW, what EWL seriously need is a rail with curves in shape and not to be forced curve when use a .curve command, since it is a straight rail afterall and hence not smooth rail.

Ya. I agree. It really need a rail with curves

joeyfjj SG

Yes, that is correct.

And the rails, you need to raise them up by 0.15m.

FSJZ SG

Yes, that is correct.

And the rails, you need to raise them up by 0.15m.

Ohhh, no wonder, that is why when I try to change to rock.bmp manually myself, the rails are hidden underneath the rocks. Thanks for telling me that!

Samuel Lee SG

Try putting railobjects into another folder? Like openBVE\Railway\Objects\BVESG_common ailtype?

If I did not recall wrongly, the NSL are in the midest of implementing new rails / viaducts right? Maybe u guys want to use The Soon version as seen in EWL or with some enhancements that the EWL currently dont have. Well --- after that, probably I will be freed from the project and hence i got time for my BVE, and I can do final checking of sectors beyond Bugis and merge them together.

Oh yes, after that I still have to do NEL (Which now still have not contributed a single thing, I am sorry about it) and following that, I suppose u guys should be ready for the next NSL release, and I hope that by then CGL V0.9 or even V1.0 is also ready, so that I can see which version is the best for a particular object and use it.

Ok, BVESG_common make sense, but, AFAIK, some objects in EWL / NSL cannot be used in NEL and I believe that CCL do connect to NEL (Go Vivocity yourself to see it, or wait for me ..... if it is possible).

FSJZ SG

Yep, I agree that we should use Soon's rails, because it comes with the third rail and guide rail on the left or right. What we need to do now is to make it curvy. For our next NSL release, I am not sure about the date, but I have heard that Joey and Flip are currently doing station objects at JUR and BSH stations respectively. Check with either, please.

Samuel Lee SG

But the main issue is CGL also got their 3rd rail, and I suppose they got the curve tracks as well. But the texture is not too realistic in my opinion. (Oh yes, certain sectors later need to use different one, like the Expo's track and one in Pioneer is the same, and a track in Clementi is same as Pasir Ris / Woodlands and Bishan.

FSJZ SG

Can do. Just a suggestion: In the tunnels, why not try fading in and out rails and fog at the end of the tunnel?

Samuel Lee SG

Can do. Just a suggestion: In the tunnels, why not try fading in and out rails and fog at the end of the tunnel?

Lazy, I think the tunnel in Bedok - Kembangan already got somehow of it. No --- I dont understand why fog it if it is not a rainy day.

FSJZ SG

Lazy, I think the tunnel in Bedok - Kembangan already got somehow of it. No --- I dont understand why fog it if it is not a rainy day.

I mean the fog will make the end of the tunnel very bright, having the impression that the train is exiting the tunnel from the TO's point of view and then it will dim back to normal brightness. You should be able to see it on most highly detailed routes like the Northern Line (London). It is quite nice actually. I guess all this will be done at a very late stage?

Samuel Lee SG

Can be considered, even though I am not sure in real life is this the case.

FSJZ SG

Can be considered, even though I am not sure in real life is this the case.

In real life, because the tunnel is very dark and the TO is suited to the darkness, when the TO sees something very bright, like an exit from the tunnel in this instance, he is temporarily blinded, but then his eyes adjust to the brightness and everything goes back to normal. However, in OpenBVE, there isn't such a function but the fog recreates it quite well. Get what I mean?

Samuel Lee SG

Oh I see, I got the idea le. There is a brightness command that I may try, but right now, due to some gaps etc, whenever the train reaches the tunnel will immediately turn to at night (Background black colour) and only about a few hundreds meters prior the exit if tunnel then change back to blue sky background.

FSJZ SG

Good idea, it will help you solve the gaps problem in the tunnel. Why not change the ground also? Like index another image of dark rocks and change the ground image to that one in the tunnel, make it more realistic.

c751bLoVuR SG

Anyone updated?

The one on the right when arriving shows:

|
|
-
|
|

It's scroll too fast.. only PSR to BGS section.

« Previous Page Next Page »